Research demonstrates that coin tosses are not equally split between success and loss for each side. Opposing the popular belief that coin tosses are random, one side has a slight advantage over the other. Coin tossing has been a common practice since ancient times, helping determine who goes first in games or aiding decision-making. With two sides to every coin, one would expect a 50 percent probability for each side, but according to researchers led by American mathematician Persi Diaconis, one side has a higher likelihood of landing face-up due to spending more time in the air with that side facing up. The bias was discovered by analyzing a smaller ideal number of recorded coin tosses, which showed that coins land on the same side from which they were tossed approximately 51% of the time. The differences in coin flips between people indicate that some exhibit a strong bias while others display none at all. These small percentages can accumulate over time, providing an advantage, especially in gambling scenarios. Knowing the starting position of the coin toss in a gambling scenario of repeated rounds would give a player an average advantage and profit of $19. Additionally, the cognitive bias known as the gambler’s fallacy comes into play when a coin repeatedly lands on the same side, leading people to believe that the probability of it landing on the other side in the following toss increases. Assuming the coin is fair, the chances of landing on either side in the next toss are equal, but if the coin is biased, the probability of landing on the side it previously fell on becomes significantly higher. Mathematician John Krich once conducted an experiment to test the fairness of coins and found that by the 6,000th toss, the results showed a 50.1% likelihood of landing on the same side as before.